You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #81: So Brinkley was lying about the backstabbing? Clinton was being naive when he
[View All]
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-17-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
| 81. So Brinkley was lying about the backstabbing? Clinton was being naive when he |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 05:05 PM by blm
went on his 3 week book tour in 2004 and defended Bush on the very issues Kerry was attacking him?
Carville didn't KNOW the WH would call Blackwell with the information about Ohio ballots?
YOU can believe that it was all naivete on TeamClinton's part - I know they also had plenty to keep quiet regarding BCCI and DIDN'T want Kerry in the WH accessing thse documents any more than Bushes did.
You can choose to believe whatever you want - the swifts DIDN'T sink Kerry - Kerry won. And if Terry McAuliffe had secured the election process after 2000s theft, Kerry would be in the WH. But McAuliffe had no desire for Kerry or ANY Dem to win in 2004. His only focus was on Hillary2008.
Clintons protect Bushes. They always have and always will. And Robert Parry gets sliced and diced daily now because he had the nerve to connect the dots.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread