Reply #47: "Kennedy insider"

[PATRICK]

Geesh, why does W have to tap phones? Source WAPO, backing Clinton and current DC establishment, no wonder. They've been doing that since JFK was shot. So who is booze guzzling source who let this rip? Another Clinton supporting kennedy? A plant? A fiction? An idiot misquoted and now hiding off martha's Vineyard?

Possibility: teddy's rage at the statement. Probability: the interpretation is all WAPO. Yes they are protective of the legacy and more than likely also sane enough to be offended at the civil rights slighting of MLK. Also mad enough to dislike the tactics of the Clinton campaign. But thanks to an invisible source, replete in our party but not the chugging WH, dissension is sown by the interpretation of Teddy's "wrath".

They can go(milelong string of expletives deleted) themselves and their insiders.

Stop using these goddamn sources for anything that causes trivial emotional warfare. they cannot be trusted. We have a couple hundred million sources for that but they don't know better every time the esteemed Foggy Bottom rag carries water for their own.

OF go ahead and defend WAPO to support this gossip. Even if subtsantially true which I doubt from MY sources, deaf ears here.