You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #11: That is not what I am saying. I am saying there is no ambiguity on where the leading [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

still_one

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Nov-03-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #4

11. That is not what I am saying. I am saying there is no ambiguity on where the leading

republican candidates stand. There is plenty of ambiguity where the leading Democrats stand, especially on Iraq

Probably, the most direct of the three leading Democrats is Edwards, but even he hasn't been consistent on Iraq, which WAS the reason the Democrats won in 2006

The leading Democrats are trying to be all things to all people, and that isn't going to cut it.

They had better get a clear, DEFINITE MESSAGE, letting us know what they are going to do, and how they distinguish themselves from the republicans, or we are screwed

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.