Reply #56: one false statement after another is what YOU are doing.

[cali]

And avoiding the points I made. You are adept at that. All you have to do is count the posts in this thread that agree with you and the ones that don't and you'll see that the majority here do not agree with you. What do recs mean? Not much; not even that people have read the OP.

"truth"? truth is highly subjective. Poll results from a broad array of polls, less so.

As for your not-so-subtle continuous insinuations that I'm stupid, they're nothing but ad hominem attacks. I'm not going to defend my intelligence to you. I'll let my posts in this thread speak for themselves. And I'm not going to stoop to your level and return the insult. I don't think you are stupid, so why say it?

You state that the reviews on DU for Clinton were poor. Yep. And that means waay less than poll results. DU, after all, consistently votes for Kucinich as their favorite choice. In the real world he gets from 2 to 7% in those nasty polls you so deride.In other words, DU's collective "wisdom", is usually off base on these matters. And no, I didn't notice that the Hillary supporters were MIA. I saw plenty of them defending her performance.

If you can't grasp that a two person debate is wholly different structure than a 7 person debate, you really should think again. And let's not forget that before the other night, she evidently did just fine in the debates. You insist that this one debate carries far more weight then those that preceded it.

You're desperate. You look desperate. You have nothing but cheap insults. You're not making your case that she's the worst possible candidate. You are, in fact, all over the map.

I'm done here, but have at it. The last word is all yours.