You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #38: So...When Edwards says we need to get insurance companies and HMOs out... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. So...When Edwards says we need to get insurance companies and HMOs out...
Edited on Sun Oct-28-07 05:38 PM by Triana
...from between patients and their doctors, he's NOT addressing the problem of PROFIT in the healthcare industry?

I certainly think he IS addressing that, separately.

EDIT: AND...knowing Edwards' record on protecting consumers from corprat predatory practices, this is another reason (besides cost) that it's a good reason to do away with direct-to-consumer advertising from pharmaceutical companies. Consumer SAFETY. Do you really think that when a pharmaceutical company is out to make money (when are they NOT?), that they care that much about the safety of their products? HOW MANY products have been allowed on the market that were later found to be UNsafe - AFTERWARDs? Do you TRUST the FDA to vet these products before they are allowed to market them? Because guess what. The FDA doesn't. They require testing. They don't DO the testing - they simply require certain reports that it's been done. If a drug company shows that some testing has been done and the product is "safe", it's allowed on the market and the drug companies are allowed to advertise it (whether it's really safe or not).

Direct-to-consumer advertising certainly increases sales. In the case of unsafe drugs that the FDA has approved, it also increases the liklihood that even more people will be made ill, debilated, or die due to those drugs.

It's a bad idea all round - EXCEPT for the pharmaceutical companies, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC