Reply #58: Well, I know I feel properly chastened. I will try to frame much longer winded, more pseudo

[renie408]

intellectual arguments from now on.

And, you know, I didn't miss the point. The point was that Lieberman or Dean's lead in the polls in 2004 was an illusion, but Hillary's lead is THE REAL THING. My poor little lazy point that polls mean zippity doo dah just seems to be getting lost in the spin. The thing that I think is a little weird is that we ALL know that the polls say what the person quoting them wants them to say. I REALLY don't have a problem with Hillary as President (I think I am supposed to, but I guess I am too lazy to try and figure out why). But I don't think that her biggest selling point is how well she is doing in the polls. I think it is kind of sad that a candidates biggest asset is their name recognition. Now, I guess that makes me naive AND lazy.