You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #126: So immature women would somehow be superior to "immature men", yet it's not about gender [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #125
126. So immature women would somehow be superior to "immature men", yet it's not about gender
Even with the careful qualifier of "immature", this still reeks of sexism. The word is misandry.

One of the contentions I and others have about her campaign is that it steadfastly denies that a lot of it's about gender. People don't ache to vote for her because she's a woman, far from it. How dare you even say such a thing. She's the best, and she's the best for us all. Somehow, even though the resounding proclamation is repeatedly made that significant support isn't coming specifically due to her gender, calls to state or defend her policies are met with either silence or deflection.

It simply doesn't pass the smell test. Yes, it's long past time for a woman president, and I think the country's ready to elect one. I just don't think she's electable, and I have major policy and character issues with her. I think she's "tough" beyond any degree of usefulness (to the point of being a blockhead) and I think she's a calculated maneuverer to such a degree that she'd do almost anything for self-survival. Some policies I out and out detest: her policy toward workers and foreign trade stand out.

Your post was rather thoughtful, but the title is despicable. It lumps certain men with children, presumably because they don't have as much control over their emotions. Even women who aren't up to snuff wouldn't stoop to such tactics, would they? If immature women aren't ga-ga over fame and power, then just what ARE their failings?

Seething under the surface are all sorts of old societal demons here, and the denial of them is not only hardly cricket, but dangerous. America doesn't like victims, and the tactic of "playing the victim" has been used by the Hillary camp a few times. It's especially unseemly from someone who's stock in trade is toughness.

Whatever you do, if you truly have the best wishes for her candidacy at heart, be VERY careful about insinuating that males are somehow emotionally inferior. Women are 51% of the population, but you're going to need some crossover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC