You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #32: "Dealing"? Your bias is showing. He wasn't going to be "dealing." Bush admin. just met...
[View All]
Honeycombe8
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-27-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 32. "Dealing"? Your bias is showing. He wasn't going to be "dealing." Bush admin. just met... |
|
with Iran. Do you think they are "dealing" with Iran? Of course not.
Clinton said she WOULD meet with ALL foreign leaders, once she was sure she wasn't going to be used by them. And first she'd send her dignitaries.
Obama said he WOULD meet with ALL foreign leaders (the implication being "he" means his administration).
There is little difference there. Nitpicky.
Keep our eyes on the ball is what I say. They are trumping up some huge difference where one doesn't exist, because they HAVE to try to appear different to win the nomination. But I see little difference in their answers. They BOTH would meet with foreign leaders to discuss issues. Not "deal."
BTW...you notice what a losing issue this non-diplomacy tact has been for the Bush administration? Such a losing issue that Bush caved in recently and started authorizing his administration to meet with Iran and other "evildoers" for diplomacy reasons. Again, they are not "dealing."
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread