Reply #48: oh, dear ... still in denial

[AtomicKitten]

You alleged I mentioned Kerry first; I did not. That's a fact. Changing the criteria for that allegation after the fact doesn't count.

In fact, I was talking about Hillary, the IWR, the DSM, and the completely ornamental Levin-Reid vs. Kerry-Feingold amendments, both of which had ZERO impact although some keep hammering the distinction as if it was anything other than moot.

I would step out on a limb and ask you, what is your problem? I am consistently tag-team assaulted by the go-Kerry crowd here and it is really, really funny that you view yourselves as victims.

Like I said, I'd ask what your problem is, but, I'm not really interested ...