You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #30: I think they do have to mention the obstructionism
[View All]
cadmium
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-01-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
30. I think they do have to mention the obstructionism |
|
In context of the congressional elections coming up the reality is that the only issues that can get hearing are the issues that the Republican leadership wants. In his speech Kerry mentioned the 2006 elections as the first step in making progress.
Think about the issue in context. We (liberals/dems) were incessantly accused of obstructionism when their issues were at all hindered in Congress. It was extremely effective for them. I agree that whining is basically lousy PR. My senators and congressman in MA work the local media like crazy (the local media by the way is often adversarial).
Speaking for myself, I don't buy into the right-wing frame that addressing the realities of congress is whining. When they did it they called it telling the truth--when we do it - it is called whining.
I'll say it grates on my nerves too and sounds like whining when our folks complain. Hopefully with repitition the public will realize talking about Republican obstructionism is stating a reality.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.