You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #2: And that is precisely why
[View All]
journalist3072
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-18-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. And that is precisely why |
|
Patrick Fitzgerald needs to hold a press conference to explain the status of the investigation.
Of course he's not obligated to under any particular law or statue.
But I believe he has a moral obligation to explain the status of the investigation. And if he has truly decided not to indict Karl Rove, I believe he should explain why. Is it because people impeded the investigation so much, that he couldn't make heads or tails of things to see who did what? Or did he have the information he needed, and decided that there was no basis for an indictment?
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread