Reply #23: You read it wrong - COMPLETELY WRONG. I am FOR censure and always have

[blm]

stressed that point.

I clearly state that I am for the dramatic way it was offered as THAT got attention.

I am not FOR the fact he chose to not even discuss it with any other senator first. And I am ABSOLUTELY opposed to his using impeachment as his bogeyman.

I can't believe people here at DU agree with Feingold that Bush shouldn't be impeached at a time of a war and that it is appropriate to sell censure as an ALTERNATIVE to impeachment.

I subnmit that the censure case is strong enough on its own merits and that Feingold doesn't NEED to remark negatively on impeachment in order to make his case.

Kerry supports censure after further investigation. Isn't that exactly what Feingold wants? Why support the immediate up/or down vote on censure that the GOP wants? Feingold said early last week he was pleased it was moved into committee and NOT forced to vote on it right away. It gives other judiciary Dems the basis for further access to NSA documents.

Methinks your comprehension gear needs some tweaking. I have not made one unreasonable point, and I think many of you have misread much of the entire debate to fit your corporate media spin against the Dems and internal discord.

BTW - since when is it a good thing to reference Alito and revise what went down then to change the storyline?