You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #131: PNAC is the Neo-Con's "Project for a New American Century" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #128
131. PNAC is the Neo-Con's "Project for a New American Century"
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 04:23 PM by radio4progressives
Papers were drafted originally in the early 90's by William Kristol, dusted off and finished in 1997 - signatories include Dick Cheney, Donalds Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfetwitz and others listed at the bottom of document linked here:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

It was presented to Clinton while he was in office, but ignored.

The Neo-Cons seized control of our government in a stunning coup vis a vis elections fraud in 2000 and again in 2004 (again not reported in papers of record until Dec 2001 on the 2000 elections theft, and not until Oct 2005 on the 2004 elections fraud - in other words, each time the papers of record waited until a full year after the fact, to report on both election frauds) and started implementing their PNAC agenda. first on the agenda: Regime change in Iraq, following with regime changes in neighboring countries.

At this point, after six years so much as been written and discussed about PNAC - I sometimes forget that it isn't yet common knowledge - and the reason why it isn't common knowledge is because the papers of record refused to ever report it's existence and it's role in the entire Iraq War Agenda.

PNAC is the KEY factor underpinning this insane, illegal, tyrannical enterprise .. it is well known, discussed widely but yet never referenced or reported on in the papers of record or mentioned in the CM.

That's prima facia evidence of Bush Administration bias, right there.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC