Reply #10: Is that why Kerry defenders always have to explain what he meant to say?

[IndianaGreen]

It is pretty bad when even a friend like Keith Olbermann plays Kerry clips showing how convoluted his message still remains.

Compare Kerry's statement to Nancy Pelosi, and you tell me which one makes the most sense:

SEN. JOHN KERRY (D), MASSACHUSETTS: The truth is that the president draws a false line in trying to make his case to America. The troops don‘t belong to his point of view. They belong to America and to Americans. They are Americans. And the best way to protect the troops, the best way to stand up for the troops, is to provide the best policy for success in Iraq.

REP. NANCY PELOSI (D-CA), MINORITY LEADER: The “Plan for Victory” backdrop which—against which the president appeared at the Naval Academy today, was no more accurate than the “Mission Accomplished” backdrop that he used over two and a half years ago on the U.S.S. “Abraham Lincoln.” The president did not have a plan for victory when he went into his war of choice in Iraq, and that he did not have a plan for victory today.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10281867/