|
Can we have some damned honesty around here. I wasn't going to say anything in this thread, but DAAAAMN. How the HELL can you say Clark was initially sympathetic AND that Dean was always opposed, IN THE SAME FUCKING SENTENCE. If you want to play the Dean was always opposed to the war, the least you could do is be honest with yourself that Clark's words on Saddam were very nearly the same as Dean's.
And if you can see that Clark expressed early concerns about the possible dangers of Saddam Hussein, then why can't you be see that Dean did too? He did, in fact, say we should give Saddam a couple of months to disarm and then go to war, alone if we have to. That's much bolder than anything Clark said, even in his testimony to Congress.
How do you do that? Why do you do that?
It's as stunning as the Bushbots.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore