You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #111: Exactly so [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
111. Exactly so
You wrote:

"The fact that this administration stonewalled, slow walked, underfunded, then stacked the deck on the chairpersons is far more telling than the half baked story that was eventually published."

I don't know if this has been brought-up, but in the art form known as 'disinformation', part of that art is sowing false information that has a kernel of truth, that can be thoroughly discredited when the rest of the explanation of an event is discredited.

Some of those 'kooky' conspiracy theories are plants, IMO. For the purpose of covering a known fact that cannot be explained away. I think stories of UFO abductions and stuff like that were plants to cover stories of of eyewitness accounts secret aircraft tests, like stealth bombers for example, and when the off the wall abduction stories came out, the eye witness accounts of strange aircrafts flying was also discounted by the general public.

Now as you say, when the government makes everything top secret, well I have to say what are you hiding? Is is really to protect the state, or is it to protect those in power acting on supposedly behalf of the government. I would say with Bu$h, much of the stuff he denies to make public is because he and his administration are screwing the American people. What else can I believe when they, "The fact that this administration stonewalled, slow walked, underfunded, then stacked the deck on the chairpersons is far more telling than the half baked story that was eventually published.", as you say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC