You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: Wow. Connecting it to Curtis-Feeney-Bush (and Gutierrez and Blass)? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Wow. Connecting it to Curtis-Feeney-Bush (and Gutierrez and Blass)?
If Karl Rove wanted to steal the entire election, would he resort to such crude tactics as hiring a few people who would surely be caught in each state? Or would he, knowing the power of US government, engage the operation in a much more subtle way. By securing contracts through the Dept of Agriculture to datamine identities, and let a few people running the BOE log in and out corrupting the aggregators.

Each aggregator has a login time, a date timestamp, and goes through a lib file parser thread. When the PA was online, I could actually secure a login name and use a password to view the registrar. Since they took it offline, I can no longer do so. However the lib parser is corrupt. It can easily delete data due to sabatoged XML.

Connecting the dots of this crime goes back to the formula these programmers basically used, Momento-XML, a free form XML with no real parser limits of data delivery. And if you can see the shady deal in action here now, and get a disgruntled feeling....It may be time to rip into the Department of Agriculture's archived contract reports.

I am not a hacker and wouldn't suggest to anyone to hack their database. However, surely a lawyer or someone who wants this resolved could simply log in and just check the contracts. If they have not covered their tracks, the contracts for the aggregators are still intact. And that means hard evidence which could bring down the whole operation if we take the initiative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC