You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: You are actually now 0 for 4 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. You are actually now 0 for 4
You claimed above to have followed IG's link and found Fineman credited as one of the authors of the piece she quoted. It turns out you didn't as he isn't credited. There is a list of people named whose reporting contributed to the piece and Fineman isn't on the list. So now we have two sources who aren't Fineman catching Clinton in the anti gay cookie jar. After awhile it become clear that everyone isn't lying on poor Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC