Reply #5: Well I understand that it was a

[FrenchieCat]

"No Brainer" because we were at War and here you have a very sharp, articulate, good looking war hero general with ALL KINDS of National Security experience running. He said Clark did very well in rural areas and with swing voters.

But, but, but.... brains was not the issue during the primaries. It was about "Party Purity" and "electibility" and listening to OUR FRIENDS, the Presstitutes. We were told that a "40 years ago War Hero" OR a good looking populist Southerner was plenty good enough. They never told us that we needed all of that rolled into one and then some.

Guess that Dems got National Security Expertise and "Any" military experience confused during the primaries. Duh!