You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: What you call 'morals'; I call [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. What you call 'morals'; I call
'mores'. "Ethics' pertains to a formalized system of behavior.

We'll just have to disagree on whether morals are absolute, or not. but I would maintain that if there is no absolute standard, then 'morals' do not exist at all.

It's OK to kill when attacked because in this situation somebody is going to be killed, anyway. Might as well be the aggressor.

Now, you can, of course, approach this from the basis of "God commands this". But there are other bases of approach. For instance, what is best, or what works best, based on human nature. Then, of course, you get into whether human nature is flexible or relatively inflexible. I belong to the relatively inflexible school myself, and I would guess that you belong to the flexible school.

Assuming, just for the sake of argument, that I am correct, I think it could be said that some cultures have practices that coincide with human nature more perfectly than others. All cultures want food, security, family, love, etc. for their members. Yet who has more security: a member of the middle class in America, or the chieftain of a Yanamomo tribe in the Amazon. That is a culture of head-hunters, the 'shrunken head' people. According to what I have read, most of their wars are over the stealing of women. As far as I am concerned, that culture is hardly worth living in. And is an immoral culture.

As I said, I do not think that we are going to come to an agreement. Culture differ, yes. What one culture considers 'moral', another may not. Yes. I consider this to be "mores". Somewhere out there there is an absolute standard of morals, just like the universe actually is governed by some distinct set of laws. It is our obligation, I think, to try to discover them. Religion and theology and philosophy and even bull-shitting, like we are doing, may be useful. Just like experimentation in science.

We seem to have wandered far from the original statement about how to "baffle a conservative". You may have baffled one or two, but I think you need cultivate a higher class of conservative. Just like us, there are dumb ones, and very,very smart ones.

Peace

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC