You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: We need a much better message machine [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Vox_Reason Donating Member (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. We need a much better message machine
For all the reasons that Touchdown mentioned, we were at a huge disadvantage in this election. Joe average is buying the popularly-disseminated Rovian talking points, because they've got a much better delivery method than we do. Our delivery method is 20th century, and they've been working for years to create a new one.

The fascists are way ahead of us now in terms of messaging. They have a whole TV "news" network to spew their talking points 24/7 without the burden of "objectivity". They have a number of "star" pundits to pimp their talking points on talk radio for at least 3 hours a day, and in many markets they have a local clone to pick up the baton for at least another 3 hours. They have a variety of well-funded "think tanks" to promulgate their fascist ideas to any weak-kneed "news organization" that will allow them on to provide Unka Karl's talking points.

After a while, this stuff's gonna convince someone who's looking for a lifeline. We're not providing a competing lifeline.

What do we need to do?

We need a competing network to Faux. Yesterday.

We need to actively support Air America sponsors and expand the network as quickly as possible.

We need to support whatever efforts are being made to fund and support liberal thinktanks to oppose the AEI's, etc.

We need to work harder at marginalizing far-right viewpoints as being what they are--fringe viewpoints. The above-mentioned apparatus has been effective at making fringe viewpoints SEEM mainstream because of the pervasiveness of their message mechanism.

This post is long enough. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC