Reply #30: I suppose you put lots of effort into this

[jarab]

newly clarified set of rules, and I'm sure many important members of DU feel appeased.
I disagree with the new rules which I had not seen posted before in a context anywhere near to approaching what you've posted.

I can support civil unions and ALL the various benefits accorded to heteros. Period.

However, it would be hypocritical of me to say that I support gay marriages when I do not. I did not know this was a litmus test for being a member. As with the great majority of Americans - overwhelmingly - I do not support gay marriage. And I do believe that John Kerry's stance is with mine - or mine with his.

I also KNOW that the gay issue cost us in this election. To what degree no one can really ever say. Therefore no one can with assurance ever know whether this issue COST us the election.

Guess you'll just have to ban this homophobe. There are surely at least hundreds more awaiting to be found out. Must be a hell of a juggling act to play to all the sides - or to those most vocal.
Well, at least some are thrilled you posted. I'm simply enlightened. I can't and won't lie to myself or you about this matter.
The rules have been changed in the middle of the game, since absolutely no one even suggested this particular litmus test (Thou shalt support gay marriages) would be applied to any DUer.

I would agree in closing that you do indeed have an "unpleasant situation".
...O...