Reply #74: No back pedaling here

[LARED]

Why did I say or imply the controlled demolition theory was uncontroversial.

Let me answer that for you. I didn't.

Someone asking if the WTC's collapse could have been the result of a controlled demolition is not a question out of fantasy land. Given the images we all saw, it was a legitimate question. A question that has been answered with a "not possible" ad nauseam.

On the other hand positing that the steel in the WTC was vaporized or disintegrated is straight out of fairy land or possibly the result of plain old ignorance. Seeing as you are an MIT grad, my guess is you have the metal capacity to figure that there exist no physical evidence that indicates steel was vaporized as you have stated. There plainly is no images or normative thought processes that brings one to the conclusion we saw steel vaporizing.