Reply #35: No, saying something over and over doesn't make it so

[plaguepuppy]

Hate to burden you with the bothersome old facts, but read this and we'll talk:

http://members.aol.com/erichuf/PainfulQuestions_1.pdf

As to your "big mouth 10 minute photo op souveiner seekers", the commentary in Fire Engineering Magazine was based on a deep and first-hand understanding of the issues involved, and was not in any sense a ploy for publicity. It was a crie de coeur at the wanton destruction of evidence that went on from the very beginning. Learn some facts before you shoot off your "big mouth."

And read the NIST "progress report" to learn that only 250 pieces of steel were saved from the hundreds of thousands that were disposed of as quickly as possible. Does this sound like a serious effort at a comprehensive investigation?