Reply #53: Get real...

[Karmakaze]

"Don't expect us to do your work for you"? Is that a joke? It's not my work. I am not claiming that a 160ft airliner hit the Pentagon. If that is what YOU say happened, then by all means prove it. I simply want to see the evidence that the Government refuses to release.

Why will they not release the videos that show this airliner? The hotel and service station videos will do, but the cameras placed at the Pentagon to cover that area would also help - as opposed to the two cameras sited to cover only the driveway, but just happened to be pointing in the right direction to catch the explosion.

As for the missile theory, that is not even the most POPULAR theory. All the theories start from the premise that it was NOT a widebody airliner. Some speculated about a missile, but they were soon disproved. Others have speculated about small military or civillian jets converted into RPV's. So far these have NOT been disproved.

In fact the most common one I have seen is that the aircraft was an S-3 Viking, based on an identification of some parts filmed in the rubble. Is this a fact? I don't know. But I do know that the Government refuses to release the footage that will prove it one way or another.

I simply have to ask, why?

In any case, if you wish to denigrate "conspiracy theories" it actually helps to know WHAT THOSE THEORIES ARE. It is simple to pick the most unlikely theory and say that has been disproved. But will you accept the challenge to disprove that an S-3 Viking, converted into a remotely piloted drone was the aircraft that hit the Pentagon? Because as far as I have been able to determine, the only way to do that is to see the videos the government doesn't want you to see.