Reply #261: One rebuttal to Jones and a "thermite reactions" explanation

[greyl]

There are a few pdfs and plenty more food for thought here

With an update from 2 days ago specifically regarding Jones:

And another Greening article suggests that perhaps a thermite reaction really did play a part in the collapse of the WTC... Though not for the reasons commonly assumed. Click here to read it
(PDF file, updated February 20th to address Professor Steven E. Jones “Experiments testing Greening's hypothesis regarding Molten Aluminum”).

I urge you to read it with an open mind and draw your own conclusions about the veracity of the arguments presented.

edit: conclusion of the updated pdf:

In conclusion I would say that Prof. Jones is, of course, entitled to his opinion, but I
would argue that his “simulation” lacks most of the key conditions that were present in
the WTC impact zones on 9-11, namely prolonged fires ignited by aviation fuel,
sustained by burning plastics, paper, furniture, etc, that directly heated water, aluminum
and rusted steel in the presence of crushed concrete and gypsum. I challenge Prof. Jones
to repeat his tests under these conditions and publish the results.
F. R. Greening
Feb 20th, 2006