You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #60: Well thanks for the link,but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Well thanks for the link,but
Edited on Mon Dec-05-05 02:18 PM by LARED
I was not looking for advice or instruction. I was trying to tell you that the conservation of angular momentum has nothing to do with why or why not the top collapsed.

Your mistake is assuming the top section continued to be a solid body as it started to rotate. See, without the core steel and perimeter steeel in the top section maintaining its connection to the structure it cannot be considered a rigid body. Look up building drift.

If you need additional info, PM me and I'll try to help.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC