Reply #5: The article also deals with U-turn

[John Doe II]

The scenario of a U-turn is also dealt with in the article.
That is a plane coming in from northwest and doing over Indian Lake (but more likely even above New Baltimore in order to account for the raining debris found there).
As stated in the article this is contradicted:
the fact that several witnesses from northwest said the plane crashed "within seconds" after vanishing behind the treeline (and not two or three minutes later. This would have been the necessaru time to do a 180° turn and fly 6 or (New Baltimore 17 further miles).

Yes, no witness in the east gives a direction of the plane they witnessed.
But wouldn't have Jim Stop mentioned the curious fact that he saw a plane crossing the Indian Lake going east (AWAY from the crash site) and ANOTHER plane was crashing west of Indian Lake. The same goes for witnesses inside Indian Lake Marina.
Moreover if the plane they saw went east. That means that the plane behind that crashed at the official crash site cannot be responisble for the raining debris but only the plane that didn't crash and that managed to cross the lake.
Even this scenario which in my eyes is very unlikely PROVES that the official explanation is a hoax and has the problem of one plane to much. No explanation for the raining debris.