Reply #67: Sure I did read them

[John Doe II]

I never claimed that the plane flew in the normal position concerning the wings. I only claimed that it was flying horizontally. As you believe the plane crashed at a 90° angle into the ground I still repeat my old question. I believe that the question if the plan was flying on its belly or with one wing downards or in its normal position doesn't change that it is highly questionable that on an altitude of 300 feet it can manage to crash at an angle of 90° when it had flown horizontally till then. Sure the position of the wings changes alot concerning the altitude that is needed to manage this manouver. That's why (especially as the eyewitnesses don't agree completely here) I told you to chose in your calculation the position of the wings that needs the lowest altitude the manage this manouver. So, once and again:
According to you:
Which altitude does the plane need to manage to crash at an 90° into the ground and how long does the whole manouvuer last?