Reply #101: Wow, a double-team snow job!

[petgoat]

Full of bluff and bluster and illogic.

Segar tells us "qualified people already understood that global collapse was inevitable"
and makes no effort to explain how they came to understand that or why they didn't show
their calculations and analysis. Hack seems to believe that explaining collapse initiation
is sufficient to explain the collapse. That's silly.

Both claim concrete pulverization is explained by calculations, while failing to consider
that no plausible mechanism can explain it. Ice breaks into chunks, not into powder. Same
with concrete.

Both dispute the free-fall speed collapse, though NIST tells us it was "essentially free fall."

Both poo poo the molten iron, Segar claiming the evidence is only "anecdotal" and hack claiming
the melting happened after the collapse. They're both wrong. Jones has samples from previously
molten iron, and hack has no evidence for his assumption, which is contradicted by the molten metal
pouring out of wtc1.