You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: RE: EXCITING ANNOUNCEMENT...Public Conference Call with Dennis Kucinich [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
rschop Donating Member (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. RE: EXCITING ANNOUNCEMENT...Public Conference Call with Dennis Kucinich
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 02:27 PM by rschop
I never heard such a bunch of soft ball and ridiculous questions in my entire life after thinking they were finally going to get somewhere in finding out more about why the US government had allowed the attacks on 9/11 to take place.

Why did they not ask Dennis Kucinich what he thought of the fact that the CIA knew in July 2001 that both Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi were going to take part in a huge al Qaeda attack that was going to take place inside of the US? This is now confirmed from emails that CIA officers sent to their CIA CTC managers in July 2001?

Why did they not ask Dennis Kucinich if he was aware of the fact that the CIA officer who had this information, Tom Wilshire, former deputy chief of the CIA Bin Laden unit, was denied permission twice in July 2001, it appears by CIA Director George Tenet and CTC manager Cofer Black, to transfer this information to the FBI criminal investigators, information that these FBI criminal investigators could have used to prevent the attacks on 9/11?

Why did they not ask Dennis Kucinich if he was aware of fact that the CIA officer who had been denied permission to transfer this information to the FBI, Tom Wilshire, was then told on August 22, 2001 that both Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi were now found inside of the USA. Wilshire clearly knew at that point that these al Qaeda terrorists were inside of the US in order to take part in the huge al Qaeda attack the CIA was aware of, and yet he not only did not alert the FBI criminal investigators but worked with FBI HQ Agent Dina Corsi to sabotage any chance that FBI Agent Steve Bongardt would have to part of the investigation and search for Mihdhar? This was the only investigation that had any chance at all to find Mihdhar and Hazmi in time to prevent the attacks on 9/11.

Why did they not ask Dennis Kucinich what he thought of the fact that on August 23, 2001 all of this same information was known by many people at the CIA, including CIA Director George Tenet and CTC manger Cofer Black, after FBI Agent Margaret Gillespie issued a world-wide alert on that date for Mihdhar and Hazmi, and none of these people alerted the FBI criminal investigators either?

It is clear that the people who claim to want to get to the bottom of why these attacks were allowed to take place have done no real research into the events prior to the attacks on 9/11, even almost 7 years after these attacks took place. They have no real idea of what actually happened prior to 9/11, or what final questions remain to prove in even more detail that the CIA and FBI HQ agents the CIA had enlisted, had deliberately allowed the attacks on 9/11 to take place.

Even though all of this information is now finally out in the public domain they have no better idea today, seven years later, then they did on 9/11 of what really occurred prior to these attacks that allowed the al Qaeda terrorists to kill almost 3000 people on 9/11.

GO FIGURE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC