If we do not sort out the red herrings

[medienanalyse]

- if we do not focus on the main issues,
- if we do not understand that the perpetrators of 9/11 are very MUCH interested to turn the 9/11 sceptics into conspiracy idiots
- if we do not see that the internet is used by them
- if we do not realize that people are paid to produce false claims

- then Bush and his administration will feel safe, and the PNAC guys will go on to laugh and feel happy.

Those who do not understand what I say may ask themselves what they would do if they were in the position to do a criminal act AND to produce "information" about that deed. Would they only look for a alibis and defend these alibis? Or would they not do a lot more and try to produce red herrings to alter the story of the criminal act?

Which are the red herrings in the "9/11-movement"?

Even if you did not recognize them untill now, would it not be a fruitfull task to look for them? And would it not be an important hint that those may be the red herrings that do NOT POINT TO A PERPETRATOR but to "somebody"? So i.e. nearly all of the so called "physical" questions?