Reply #16: Yes, I read the article.

[Jazz2006]

And have been pondering what a "video presentation of the cockpit voice recorder" is supposed to mean. My initial reaction to that line in the story is that it sounds bogus to me. By that, I mean that it sounds like a "dramatization" unless there was an actual video camera running at the time, and I have never heard of there being live video on the aircraft before. If it is not an actual, live, authentic video created contemporaneously with the events, it should not - in my view - have been admitted into evidence at trial.

But it will still be interesting to see and hear the other Exhibits that were not published during the trial.