Official story to LIHOP to MIHOP in two easy steps.

[Lerkfish]

(I think I posted this before, but can't find it in a search, so I'll restate it to the best of my recollection)

A lot of people think its tinfoil hat time to suggest LIHOP or MIHOP, because they get bogged down in missing plane theories and demolition charges, etc. (not that any or all of those theories may or may not be true)

but the fact remains, EVEN IF THE OFFICIAL STORY IS COMPLETELY TRUE, it can still be moved to LIHOP and then to MIHOP in two easy, perfectly rational and believable steps.

FIRST:

Assume the official story is true: planes crashed due to a conspiracy of Al Queda cells into the WTC which then collapsed the buildings, etc, etc.

OK


TO MOVE IT TO LIHOP:

Merely add that intelligence agencies, who were already tracking the hijackers, knew in advance of their plans and did nothing.

TO MOVE IT TO MIHOP:

Merely add that intelligence agencies, who were already tracking the hijackers, knew in advance of their plans and actively and intentionally ignored warnings or outright prevented apprehension of the hijackers.


Considering what we know already, that several people within agencies sent warnings up the ladder to certain superiors who quashed the investigation regarding the hijackers PRIOR to 9/11, LIHOP or even MIHOP is well within rational possibility.

To label LIHOP and MIHOP as tin foil theories is flat wrong. Oh, one could argue the merits of ancillary theories, like missing planes and whatnot, but THAT IS NOT THE POINT. The point is whether the govt. KNEW in advance of the attack and either ALLOWED it to happen or ACTIVELY blocked any attempt to interfere with it.


thanks for listening.