You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: It was a rough estimate I did in my head, but since you asked politely... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It was a rough estimate I did in my head, but since you asked politely...
Edited on Thu Mar-23-06 02:57 PM by file83
(unlike the smartass below that said "On what planet?")

If it takes a 500ft building 8sec to fall, then it would follow that a 1000 ft building would take about twice as long (or maybe less since the longer the objects fall, the higher their velocity). From watching the videos it seems (I've seen a wide variety of interpretations on this) to me that the buildings took about 15-18 seconds to fall. I'll assume 18 seconds for this example. It's hard to tell exactly when the "falls" terminate because of all the dust. But anyway, the WTC 1 & 2 were 1368 ft tall.

Tojan cooling tower: 500ft / 8sec = 62.5ft/sec (average speed of fall)
WTC Towers: 1368ft / 18sec = 76ft/sec (average speed of fall)

It makes sense that the WTC towers would have a higher average fall speed because they had longer to pick up velocity. Like I said, it seems to me that they are falling at almost exactly the same rate/time.

If you have different data or reasoning, please share so we can compare notes! :thumbsup:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC