Reply #22: Then they should have another, closer look at it

[Kevin Fenton]

The vast majority of Meyssan's arguments were not just wrong, but intirely ficticious, for example:
(1) The plane passed through two walls, not six;
(2) The walls were not reinforced concrete, but masonry and limestone;
(3) The part it hit was not empty;
(4) It hit the edge of the renovated section, not the middle;
(5) The renovations did next to nothing to mitigate the effect of the impact damage;
(6) The video stills are clear fakes;
(7) The eyewitnesses generally think it was a medium-haul jetliner, not a missile.
Etc.

What do you honestly think? 757 or not?