Reply #17: Atta and Atta

[Andre II]

I think it is certain beyound a shadow of a doubt in view of the enomrity of evidence that there have been two Attas around.
Especially convincing is the appearance of two Attas on September 7 and 8, 2001 (plus all the evidence you've presented).
I see abosultely no possibility that al Qaeda sent two Attas into the US.
To send already one was extremely risky but two? And what for? Why run the risk for the most importat operation? Why would the FBI and CIA cover up the presence of two Attas if this would present a perfect excuse for the confusion?
Add to this the fact that Atta often behaved extremely conspicously and not at all interested in remain in the dark. Add to this the strong evidence that Atta is by far not the only case of an alleged hijacker having a doppelgaenger and wonder which direction this points?
For me it is the strongest evidence of 911 being an inside job I've seen so far.
For me it is a clear proof that you can even explain your neighbour in the bus within five minutes that there has been a huge cover up.

As far as I can see there is one Atta who eg vaguely knew he was hijacking planes (though not knew it would be a suicide mission).
And there is another who was in the know of 911 being an inside job and took care to plant evidences and leave his suspicious trail.
The one who had no idea of the aim of 911 boarded the plane.

For all people who don't care:
If there were two Attas then it follows that at least one didn't die in the plane.