Reply #3: To anwer your question honestly...

[file83]

...I don't see anything weird about the pictures. The only thing I saw for the first time was in the bottom photograph. I've never seen the red (port side) light on the left wing before.

Concerning descent, like the other guy said, it's very speculative to be judging the angle of asscent/descent of a plane in still photos, let alone video. Even in real life it can be difficult to judge. The only thing that would give you objective facts would be the flight data recorder, which conveniently was "never found".

I'm assuming (correct me if I'm wrong) your looking for some sort of evidence of faked photos and that that might help support some part of either a LIHOP or MIHOP theory. I commend you on sifting through this great stack of hay for the proverbial needle, but the "fault" you're looking for is going to have to be something glaringly obvious and objective, not a subjective interpretation of airplane motion in still photographs.

Regardless, a plane did hit the building. A real plane. You'll have to dig deeper than photographs to prove that that plane wasn't the plane the official story claims it is. (Like flight records, FAA records, Airplane "graveyards". Can you imagine if they thought they could just scrap the real plane in some desert yard outside of Tucson? Get a picture of that and you would blow the whole cover-up wide open and be read about in the history books.)