You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #43: Not for bogus numbers
[View All]
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-04-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
43. Not for bogus numbers |
|
and the numbers in that article are worthless because they're based on completely ridiculous "guesses," "ballpark figures" and assumptions.
If you can't figure that out, you have no business discussing the subject to begin with.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.