Reply #45: i have a response to snopes as well

[greenman2]

http://911review.org/Wiki/snopespentagonrumor.html

as far as the plane hitting the ground first,
thats PURE B.S.
The cable reels below are 7 ft. tall (for the tallest) which was directly in the path of the Boeing.
For the bottom of the craft to clear these reels it would have had to be over 7 ft. off the ground, which puts the wings at 7 1/2 ft. MORE =14 1/2 ft. (minimum). The right wing would also have had to clear the generator which was over 10 ft. tall
Which puts the right wing at 17 ft. minimum. The plane was said to be traveling at 500 mph+ and witnesses say it "reved up" just before impact.
How did the damage to the bottom of the pentagon, right of the impact point occur?
http://757.batcave.net/

and so the engine hit this wall, but DIDNT knock down these cable reels ???


now, imagine this in 3D in your head...

see the height of the generator ?
see the height of the cable reels ?

now, imagine the right wing striking the generator...





the bottom of the "belly" of the plane, is almost as low as the bottom of the engine.
if the right wing was so low as to hit the generator,
and the left engine hit the ground,
then the belly of the craft would have hit the cable reels.

imagine again if you will, a more than 13ft tall tube, over 155ft long (no tail included)
bouncing off light poles, generators, and concrete retaining walls,
with the wings tilted,
hitting that wall, and going in at such an angle,
so that the tube doesnt tilt left/right. or up/down.

what i mean by that, is the fuselage should have had a vertical, and horizontal change.
and the wings hitting those objects should have forced the nose into the ground,
forcing the rest of the fuselage upward.
these impacts should also have caused the fuselage to change its direction sideways.
not leaving a clean holes as it did, and also leaving a crumpled fuselage behind.

closeups of the pentagon lawn...
http://close.batcave.net/
http://911review.org/brad.com/Pentagon_Closeup_Photos.html
http://911review.org/brad.com/pentagonpictures.html

also , what was in the exit "punch out" hole ?




this wasnt part of a 757
http://pentagon.batcave.net/hole.html

soeaking of debris, yes there WAS SOME...

(large photo here...)
http://911review.org/brad.com/noplane.html
but what is it from ?
this is the remains of a contractors trailer...


http://investigate911.bravehost.com/trailer.html

if the plane hit a trailer BEFORE it hit the pentagon,
then HOW THE F** did it leave that round hole?
and can we trust ANY witness that says they saw the plane hit the pentagon ?
wouldnt they say, they saw the plane hit a TRAILER in FRONT of the pentagon ???


why were the columns bent the wrong way ?
http://damage.1accesshost.com/

also see...
http://no757.batcave.net
http://911review.org/