Reply #40: pure and clean as the driven snow

[petgoat]

That's an over-the-top straw man, even for you.

few in Congress or the Senate are interested in finding out why 9/11 happened.

You got that right. The intelligence community wanted covered up all kinds of
pre-Bush stuff--why did the FBI take Emad Salem off the Blind Sheikh case when
he was so close to the '93 bomb plot he was in a position to substitute harmless
powder for the explosives?

Why were the Project Bojinka warnings from the Philippines (of an al Qaeda plot to
fly hijacked airliners into landmarked buildings such as WTC and Sears Tower) ignored?

Why was the Able Danger project not able to investigate Mohammed Atta?

Was Terry Nichols's possible connection to al Qaeda bomber Ramzi Yousef in the
Philippines ever seriously investigated? Was John Doe #2? Was credible reports
of other bombs planted in the building?

Why was Ali Mohamed, who trained the Blind Sheikh's al Qaeda cell and was convicted
of involvement in the African embassy bombings, never sentenced? And where is he now?

Obviously the 9CR was a game of Mah Jong where each embarassment covered up under
one administration was matched to embarassments covered up for the other. Trading
this way, they took down and suppressed a heap of facts. What was left was the
9/11 Commission Report.