You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #448: Your Opinion Has No Reasoning With It. No Dismissal Of Evidence Possible. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Christophera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #314
448. Your Opinion Has No Reasoning With It. No Dismissal Of Evidence Possible.
Edited on Sun Dec-04-05 01:55 PM by Christophera
Common knowledge of the structural character of materials will identify the materials in use in the towers. Steel will have protruding, silouetted vertical elements remaining from broken, bent damaged steel core columns IF multple steel cores existed.



Do we see any? NO. ( See bottom photo for example of structural steel.)

Since there are no silouetted structural elements protruding, the only other material that might be in use for a core is steel reinforced concrete and that WOULD leave a rounded, eroded top after the fall of debris shaped it just as we see in the top image. We have determined that the liklyhood of a concrete core is moreso than that of a steel core.

Clearly the first unidentified opinion by 7 below is in error or incomplete.

Posted by Make7

]First picture:There is no way to determine what that structure is made out of just from this picture. It proves nothing without adequate supporting evidence. (Which in my opinion, you do not have.)


At top we establish that If the core has no broken, bent and protruding steel then the core might be concrete, which is totally supported by the solid appearance at the top edges. Steel structure would be silouetting. If the core were concrete, rebar might be seen.



The size of the above elements is too small to be steel core columns and this is proven by the relative size of the columns in the below photo showing heavy steel columns OUTSIDE (interior box columns) the core area at one corner.



With the reasoning of this post I have shown that the first opinion, unidentified as such is in error or incomplete and that the supporting evidence I have for the contention that the core was concrete is logical and complete for the purposes intended.

If the core was concrete then there would be MUCH more sand and gravel at ground zero or huge chunks of concrete. We do have way more mineral based material in the basement than the FEMA design would accomodate, and .......... there is lots of gravel, something the official plan does not place inthe building.

No physical evidence exists for the official core presented by FEMA.







By default and logic, simple reasoning of inference, deduction, conclusion in reasoning, the core of the towers were steel reinforced cast concrete.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC