Reply #244: I've got as much business as you do!

[ryan_cats]

I've got as much business as you do!

C4 coated rebar, please. That is so out there that any positive contribution you've made goes out the window and as I said before, using you own website as a source, (self sourcing) is not acceptable.

In the video that was posted, you could see what looked like gravel before they smoothed the cement. I just watched the video again and 1/2 way through part 2 it shows them pouring the floor cement and you can clearly see gravel in it.

There is something weird in the video in only one place I saw what looks like rubber rafts?? wrapped around several floors of one of the towers. This is at the 3/4 point in the video in part 2. I have no idea what this is for.

When someone finds something that invalidates your theory to put it kindly, you come up with more outlandish theories instead of possibly, acknowledging that you might be going down the wrong path. Implying that the pictures of the concrete core have been scrubbed from evidence is a little bit out there, too. Do they have a neuralizer like in Men in Black so the people who did it have had their memories erased?

Fly ash is not an aggregate, it's used to replace "Portland cement" and is an ash, hence the name, "Fly Ash".

From:http://www.flyashdirect.com/ash_industry.html

Fly Ash – Over 60% of total CCP production is fly ash. Fly ash is the very fine particulate matter that is captured in an electrostatic precipitator or fabric filter bag house. These fly ash particles would otherwise be released from the smokestack into the atmosphere. Fly ash is most often used in concrete as a replacement for part of the Portland cement.

You appear to be a tireless worker for the truth on what really happened. I still partly believe that the towers were brought down by the planes. However, it's clear WTC-7 was demolished which then raises the question, if 7 was demolished, what about the towers? I have no dog in this hunt but I along with several other posters do not believe there was a concrete core and nothing except actual blueprints or pictures will prove otherwise. Let me ask you one thing, if there wasn't concrete cores as you assert, what are the other possibilities for demolition? What I'm saying is for you to put aside the concrete core theory and put your energy in solving the demolition problem with there being a steel core. It clearly showed large box columns in that video in the core. It even mentions them.

BTW, how many times have you posted that same picture with the idea the repetition will somehow make it true? You've posted it so many times DU will probably have to pay royalties on it.