You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #54: Your "theory" is not proved by the absence of competing theories.
[View All]
AZCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-08-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #53 |
54. Your "theory" is not proved by the absence of competing theories. |
|
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 10:40 PM by AZCat
You act as if this is some sort of "zero-sum game" where if nobody presents sufficient proof to support a competing theory then your theory is somehow more valid.
I am not interested in proving anything to you. I am not interested in discussing your theory with you. But I am not going to let you claim "establishment" of any theory because contradictory evidence doesn't satisfy you or because no-one has adequately explained the collapse to you.
Edit: clarity
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.