Reply #133: I don't "put my faith" in Lee Hamilton

[aaronnyc]

In my previous post I admitted that there are legitimate questions about the accuracy of the report's findings. While the report was not willing to directly place blame on the White House, they did admit that there were many flaws in the immediate response to 9/11. Thus, it seems likely that they would have agreed that NORAD was slower to react to 9/11 than they were to Payne Stewart - if there was clear-cut evidence of this.

I don't know whether the commission's findings are correct. The Report has flaws, but so does CNN, and you have been unwilling to question their article.
Is your unwillingness to question CNN a rule of principal, or does it only apply to when they agree with you?