Reply #67: No, we'll simply have to agree that you cannot

[immune]

come up with the names of the volunteers who peer reviewed Bazant's Paper. We do, of course, know that it was submitted to James Gourley for review, and we do know how he responded. That's it ... nobody else is talking. Including you.

So when you break a hip, we'll expect you to be satisfied to have a paper written up on your bone fracture in the Journal of Evolutionary Anthropology since they know all about how man learned to walk upright, well at least until he broke a hip.

This whole argument about flawless holy journals makes as much sense as that.

The evidence was hauled away and the proper tests were not performed by the appointed investigators. Period. One might wonder what the ones doing the appointing have to hide. Actually tens of millions of people are wondering exactly that and you can't stop them from wondering by waving plausible deniability papers in their faces. It just isn't working this time.