Reply #37: "IT isn't peer-reviewed." What is your proof of that assertion?

[tetedur]

Why doesn't your "side" submit a study of the WTC dust that refutes their findings to JEM, get it published, make it available to everyone and then "we'll talk."

You said, "those red-gray chips aren't thermite." Do you not understand that they didn't assert the re-gray chips were mere "thermite" but thermitic nano material? Other than that the authors of "Active Thermitic Material" say they don't know exactly what this stuff is. They know they are not equipped to manufacture it. They also know what it is not and they give reasons for their assertions.

As for the accusation that they are "taking advantage of the conspiratorially prone" what is exactly the benefit for them? It's a conspiracy to get rich to fund their "unemployment and retirement?" Why are they making their research available for free on the internet? Also, as far as I know, only two men involved with this project lost a job or retired.

But go ahead, knock people who lose a job. Have fun.