You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #101: Griffin the fraud: A case in point
[View All]
William Seger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-11-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #91 |
| 101. Griffin the fraud: A case in point |
|
I'm pretty danged sure the "scholarly" Dr. Griffin is smart enough to know that "something can't happen unless it's happened before" is a perfectly idiotic argument. Why does he imply that? Have high-rise steel structures partially collapsed because of fire? Yes. Have steel structures that weren't high-rises completely collapsed because of fire? Yes. Have any buildings similar in design details to WTC7 sustained 7-hour unfought fires on 6 floors? No. Does Griffin or any of his disciples offer any scientifically valid reason why WTC7 shouldn't have collapsed because of that fire? No. Do any of them offer any scientifically valid criticism of NIST's expansion hypothesis? No.
You've been had.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread