Reply #108: Blatently misleading thread title, Abe

[Bolo Boffin]

In case you're unaware, the format you've used attributes the position after the colon to the entity in front of the colon. In other words, your title is saying that the ASCE report states that the damage to the Pentagon is consistent with a missile and fighter jet hypothesis.

Nothing could be further from the truth, which even a cursory examination of the report makes clear. You don't even believe that, because you immediately scurry back to the position that "it seems to that the ASCE Report is NOT inconsistent" with the missile/fighter jet hypothesis.

So the thread would be more appropriately titled:

Abe Linkman: ASCE Report Consistent with damage from missile & fighter jet.

Further, you make an interesting statement:

In fact, it makes far more sense than trying to reconcile the damage pattern with the Official Story Conspiracy Theory, with the added advantage of not having to explain the total disappearance of a huge 757 engine.

Hmm. How much larger is a fighter jet and missile than a single 757 engine? It seems to me that you have just as much explaining to do as to how a much larger fighter jet "totally disappeared" than anyone else does in explaining what happened to an engine.

The ASCE Report shows clearly how the damage to the Pentagon is consistent only with the crash of a large 757 jetliner. Which is exactly what happened.