Reply #51: Oh, you only care about CORROBORATED witnesses?

[William Seger]

And of course the vastly larger number of witnesses who not only corroborate each other but also the massive physical (yes, phyisical) evidence and the documentary evidence such as the photos, radar track, and FDR path data -- well, they're not really "witnesses" at all in your tiny little world of delusion and circular logic, because the plane didn't hit the building, right? That's what you set out on your "research project" to prove, and this bullshit is simply the best you could come up with, so that's what you've put on the 9/11 bullshit market.

You asked in a different post how it was possible for a plane to come from the north side of the Citgo and cause that clear path of destruction from the light poles to that hole in the C ring. There isn't any polite way to say that I very firmly believe that anyone who can't solve that "mystery" in about two seconds is simply not very bright. Either that, or they have some obsession with an agenda that strongly resembles mental illness. If you wanted to assume that the NoC path is correct, just for the sake of argument, and see where that leads, then add maybe another 10 seconds to realize that you arrive at conclusions that are absurd, e.g. the impossibility of faking all that physical evidence right in front of hundreds of witnesses and the zero-percent chance of your idiotic "fireball magic trick" working. When you spend nearly three years "investigating" and still don't realize that those absurd conclusions are not supported by a shred of evidence or any credible eyewitness account, then it seems to me that either you have a serious mental problem or you are deliberately trying to scam people who are too dumb to figure it out. Which is it, PentaCON?

You come back with, oh, but Roberts is a "flyover" witness! But all anyone has to do is listen to his account to realize that it's impossible to even figure out a coherent time line, much less match any part of his account to any other witness, including your own. He says the "second plane" did a U-turn and flew back to the southwest, right past those same witnesses you claim were fooled by the "magic trick" of the plane flying into the fireball! And as I'll point out again, just because you obviously have nothing but a ridiculous answer, if it took him 5 to 10 seconds to get out on the loading dock, there is no way he could have seen your claimed "flyover" plane anywhere over the south parking lot, so there is simply no way he could corroborate your fantasy, regardless of what he says.

And as you well know, but others may not, even other "truthers" don't buy this idiotic bullshit, for (just one) example:
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/05/critical-review-of-pentacon-smoking-gun.html
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/11/cit-craig-ranke-aldo-marquis-and.html

And I don't think I ever congratulated you for producing the video other "truthers" voted as being the one they would least likely recommend to other "truthers." Great job.

I looked for a few minutes for some of the stuff Russell Pickering had to say about your "conclusion based on the evidence" and some of his insights into that initial trip to DC with you guys and Avery, but didn't find it right away. But go ahead and post your circular reasoning one more time while I look for it. Which reminds me: Besides Pickering and John Farmer, are there any other researchers that you guys have convinced to quit the "truth movement?"